The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1101
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.79
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1102
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.77
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 2.12
1103
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.47
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1104
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 120.29
TTFR rankings: 254
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1105
Age: 19.9
Average rating: 363.24
TTFR rankings: 767
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1106
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 74.43
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1107
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.78
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1108
Age: 8.1
Average rating: 11.39
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1109
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.59
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1110
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.57
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 2.11
1111
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.51
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1112
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.26
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1113
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.41
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1114
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.22
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 2.1
1115
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 186.87
TTFR rankings: 391
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1116
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.72
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1117
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 172
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1118
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.47
TTFR rankings: 74
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1119
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 295.37
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 2.09
1120
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.67
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1121
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 67.23
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1122
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.02
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1123
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.31
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 2.08
1124
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 171
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1125
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.28
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1126
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.28
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1127
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.85
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1128
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 132.56
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 2.07
1129
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.64
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1130
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.65
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1131
Age: 20.3
Average rating: 378.98
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1132
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.49
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1133
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.49
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1134
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.47
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 2.06
1135
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 120.29
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1136
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.57
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 2.05
1137
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 57.22
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1138
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 141.94
TTFR rankings: 290
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1139
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 136.15
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1140
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 168
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1141
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.45
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1142
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.77
TTFR rankings: 197
Ratio Superior: 2.04
1143
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 60.46
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1144
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.75
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1145
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.67
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1146
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.26
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1147
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 295.37
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1148
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 295.37
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1149
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 153.17
TTFR rankings: 311
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1150
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.47
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 2.03
1151
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 71.74
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1152
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 50.02
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1153
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.77
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1154
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 81.38
TTFR rankings: 164
Ratio Superior: 2.02
1155
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1156
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 63.09
TTFR rankings: 127
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1157
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.78
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 2.01
1158
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 2
1159
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.41
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 2
1160
Age: 16
Average rating: 111.45
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 2
1161
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 65.02
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 2
1162
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.02
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 2
1163
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 13.02
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 2
1164
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 91.84
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1165
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.74
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1166
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 77.91
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1167
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 40.78
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1168
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 363.67
TTFR rankings: 722
Ratio Superior: 1.99
1169
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 70.1
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1170
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.63
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1171
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 353.74
TTFR rankings: 699
Ratio Superior: 1.98
1172
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 11.65
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1173
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35.47
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1174
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.79
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1175
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.07
TTFR rankings: 75
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1176
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 1.97
1177
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.53
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1178
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.39
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1179
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 178.47
TTFR rankings: 350
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1180
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 209.58
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1181
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.68
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1182
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 17.38
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.96
1183
Age: 13
Average rating: 41.45
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1184
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 146.38
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1185
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.42
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1186
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.74
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1187
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 13.32
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1188
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 42.56
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1189
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 214.6
TTFR rankings: 418
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1190
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 136.15
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 1.95
1191
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.77
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1192
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 47.39
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1193
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.57
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1194
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 17.57
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 1.94
1195
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 343.85
TTFR rankings: 665
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1196
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.49
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1197
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.57
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1198
Age: 16
Average rating: 111.45
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1199
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.53
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 1.93
1200
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 115.34
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 1.92

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников