The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№201
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 112.64
TTFR rankings: 734
Ratio Superior: 6.52
№202
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 65.22
TTFR rankings: 424
Ratio Superior: 6.5
№203
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 67.36
TTFR rankings: 429
Ratio Superior: 6.37
№204
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 87.31
TTFR rankings: 554
Ratio Superior: 6.35
№205
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 129.3
TTFR rankings: 819
Ratio Superior: 6.33
№206
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.64
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 6.3
№207
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 60.46
TTFR rankings: 380
Ratio Superior: 6.29
№208
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 97.93
TTFR rankings: 615
Ratio Superior: 6.28
№209
Age: 18.9
Average rating: 296.47
TTFR rankings: 1860
Ratio Superior: 6.27
№210
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 184.21
TTFR rankings: 1153
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№211
Age: 14
Average rating: 62.17
TTFR rankings: 389
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№212
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 171.5
TTFR rankings: 1073
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№213
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 153.2
TTFR rankings: 946
Ratio Superior: 6.17
№214
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.42
TTFR rankings: 224
Ratio Superior: 6.15
№215
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 50.67
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 6.12
№216
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.55
TTFR rankings: 95
Ratio Superior: 6.11
№217
Age: 17.5
Average rating: 191.75
TTFR rankings: 1171
Ratio Superior: 6.11
№218
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 14.74
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 6.11
№219
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.63
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 6.09
№220
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 184.21
TTFR rankings: 1122
Ratio Superior: 6.09
№221
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 117
Ratio Superior: 6.09
№222
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.55
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 6.07
№223
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 116.39
TTFR rankings: 705
Ratio Superior: 6.06
№224
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 6.04
№225
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.09
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 6.03
№226
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.26
TTFR rankings: 194
Ratio Superior: 6.01
№227
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.32
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 6
№228
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 12.88
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 5.98
№229
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 233.07
TTFR rankings: 1391
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№230
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.09
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 5.96
№231
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.09
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 5.96
№232
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.22
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 5.95
№233
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 233.07
TTFR rankings: 1382
Ratio Superior: 5.93
№234
Age: 15
Average rating: 85.05
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 5.93
№235
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.52
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 5.92
№236
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 196.28
TTFR rankings: 1161
Ratio Superior: 5.92
№237
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 83.16
TTFR rankings: 491
Ratio Superior: 5.9
№238
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 88.09
TTFR rankings: 519
Ratio Superior: 5.89
№239
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 64.18
TTFR rankings: 378
Ratio Superior: 5.89
№240
Age: 18.3
Average rating: 244.47
TTFR rankings: 1431
Ratio Superior: 5.85
№241
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.41
TTFR rankings: 131
Ratio Superior: 5.85
№242
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.66
TTFR rankings: 97
Ratio Superior: 5.82
№243
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.32
TTFR rankings: 112
Ratio Superior: 5.8
№244
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.46
TTFR rankings: 101
Ratio Superior: 5.78
№245
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 311.1
TTFR rankings: 1799
Ratio Superior: 5.78
№246
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.99
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 5.78
№247
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.12
TTFR rankings: 306
Ratio Superior: 5.76
№248
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.15
TTFR rankings: 323
Ratio Superior: 5.75
№249
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 68.51
TTFR rankings: 394
Ratio Superior: 5.75
№250
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.82
TTFR rankings: 170
Ratio Superior: 5.7
№251
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.55
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 5.66
№252
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.28
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 5.65
№253
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 43.89
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 5.63
№254
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 58.83
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 5.63
№255
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.31
TTFR rankings: 159
Ratio Superior: 5.62
№256
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.13
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 5.58
№257
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 5.57
№258
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.82
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 5.57
№259
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 203.23
TTFR rankings: 1131
Ratio Superior: 5.57
№260
Age: 15
Average rating: 85.05
TTFR rankings: 473
Ratio Superior: 5.56
№261
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.42
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 5.55
№262
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.46
TTFR rankings: 96
Ratio Superior: 5.5
№263
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39.05
TTFR rankings: 214
Ratio Superior: 5.48
№264
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.12
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 5.48
№265
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 79.45
TTFR rankings: 435
Ratio Superior: 5.48
№266
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.6
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 5.47
№267
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.82
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 5.47
№268
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 203.23
TTFR rankings: 1110
Ratio Superior: 5.46
№269
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.87
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 5.46
№270
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.26
TTFR rankings: 176
Ratio Superior: 5.46
№271
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.81
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 5.45
№272
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.12
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 5.44
№273
Age: 19.6
Average rating: 354.03
TTFR rankings: 1926
Ratio Superior: 5.44
№274
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 64.18
TTFR rankings: 349
Ratio Superior: 5.44
№275
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.52
TTFR rankings: 220
Ratio Superior: 5.43
№276
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.63
TTFR rankings: 150
Ratio Superior: 5.43
№277
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.21
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 5.42
№278
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 91.32
TTFR rankings: 494
Ratio Superior: 5.41
№279
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.16
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 5.41
№280
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 16.66
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 5.4
№281
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.28
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 5.38
№282
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.09
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 5.37
№283
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.5
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 5.36
№284
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 5.36
№285
Age: 17
Average rating: 162.69
TTFR rankings: 871
Ratio Superior: 5.35
№286
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.44
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 5.35
№287
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 70.61
TTFR rankings: 377
Ratio Superior: 5.34
№288
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 178.61
TTFR rankings: 953
Ratio Superior: 5.34
№289
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.81
TTFR rankings: 143
Ratio Superior: 5.33
№290
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 13.33
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 5.33
№291
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.63
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 5.31
№292
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 5.31
№293
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 16.98
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 5.3
№294
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.46
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 5.27
№295
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 83.16
TTFR rankings: 436
Ratio Superior: 5.24
№296
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.93
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 5.24
№297
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.02
TTFR rankings: 219
Ratio Superior: 5.21
№298
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.13
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 5.21
№299
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 5.2
№300
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 85.87
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 5.19
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
