The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 15.58
TTFR rankings: 354
Ratio Superior: 22.72
№2
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.24
TTFR rankings: 680
Ratio Superior: 21.09
№3
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.51
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 20.73
№4
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.89
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 18.9
№5
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.32
TTFR rankings: 344
Ratio Superior: 18.78
№6
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 11.53
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 18.3
№7
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.65
TTFR rankings: 413
Ratio Superior: 17.46
№8
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 778
Ratio Superior: 16.94
№9
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.82
TTFR rankings: 434
Ratio Superior: 16.18
№10
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.51
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 16.18
№11
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 16.46
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 16.1
№12
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.05
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 16.01
№13
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.89
TTFR rankings: 296
Ratio Superior: 15.67
№14
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.65
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 15.64
№15
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 39
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 15.38
№16
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.16
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 15.35
№17
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.8
TTFR rankings: 446
Ratio Superior: 14.97
№18
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.96
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 14.89
№19
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.48
TTFR rankings: 601
Ratio Superior: 14.85
№20
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 12.51
TTFR rankings: 183
Ratio Superior: 14.63
№21
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.51
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 14.37
№22
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 13.55
TTFR rankings: 193
Ratio Superior: 14.24
№23
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 36.41
TTFR rankings: 504
Ratio Superior: 13.84
№24
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 34.62
TTFR rankings: 479
Ratio Superior: 13.84
№25
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 83.19
TTFR rankings: 1133
Ratio Superior: 13.62
№26
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.07
TTFR rankings: 761
Ratio Superior: 13.57
№27
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 58.75
TTFR rankings: 791
Ratio Superior: 13.46
№28
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.43
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 13.29
№29
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17
TTFR rankings: 222
Ratio Superior: 13.06
№30
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.89
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 13.02
№31
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 70.63
TTFR rankings: 908
Ratio Superior: 12.86
№32
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.95
TTFR rankings: 228
Ratio Superior: 12.7
№33
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.61
TTFR rankings: 321
Ratio Superior: 12.53
№34
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 575
Ratio Superior: 12.52
№35
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 56.07
TTFR rankings: 695
Ratio Superior: 12.4
№36
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 142.9
TTFR rankings: 1746
Ratio Superior: 12.22
№37
Age: 14
Average rating: 62.09
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 12.21
№38
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 64.04
TTFR rankings: 772
Ratio Superior: 12.05
№39
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.05
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 11.97
№40
Age: 11
Average rating: 18.32
TTFR rankings: 216
Ratio Superior: 11.79
№41
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.04
TTFR rankings: 616
Ratio Superior: 11.61
№42
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 42.1
TTFR rankings: 486
Ratio Superior: 11.54
№43
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.95
TTFR rankings: 203
Ratio Superior: 11.31
№44
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 43.95
TTFR rankings: 495
Ratio Superior: 11.26
№45
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.16
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 11.26
№46
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.91
TTFR rankings: 426
Ratio Superior: 11.24
№47
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.82
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 11.11
№48
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.61
TTFR rankings: 284
Ratio Superior: 11.09
№49
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.65
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 10.91
№50
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.96
TTFR rankings: 337
Ratio Superior: 10.89
№51
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 17.95
TTFR rankings: 195
Ratio Superior: 10.86
№52
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.91
TTFR rankings: 411
Ratio Superior: 10.84
№53
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 13.33
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 10.8
№54
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 78.52
TTFR rankings: 846
Ratio Superior: 10.77
№55
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.61
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 10.7
№56
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 153.91
TTFR rankings: 1618
Ratio Superior: 10.51
№57
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.8
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 10.37
№58
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.61
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 10.31
№59
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 67.2
TTFR rankings: 691
Ratio Superior: 10.28
№60
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 136.92
TTFR rankings: 1403
Ratio Superior: 10.25
№61
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.82
TTFR rankings: 270
Ratio Superior: 10.07
№62
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 83.19
TTFR rankings: 837
Ratio Superior: 10.06
№63
Age: 16
Average rating: 120.57
TTFR rankings: 1212
Ratio Superior: 10.05
№64
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 74.37
TTFR rankings: 745
Ratio Superior: 10.02
№65
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.05
TTFR rankings: 981
Ratio Superior: 10.01
№66
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 14.48
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 9.94
№67
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.05
TTFR rankings: 972
Ratio Superior: 9.91
№68
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.8
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 9.9
№69
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 58.75
TTFR rankings: 580
Ratio Superior: 9.87
№70
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 18.89
TTFR rankings: 186
Ratio Superior: 9.85
№71
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 76.37
TTFR rankings: 751
Ratio Superior: 9.83
№72
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 37.91
TTFR rankings: 371
Ratio Superior: 9.79
№73
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.65
TTFR rankings: 230
Ratio Superior: 9.73
№74
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.65
TTFR rankings: 264
Ratio Superior: 9.55
№75
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 53.04
TTFR rankings: 505
Ratio Superior: 9.52
№76
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.49
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 9.43
№77
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.26
TTFR rankings: 313
Ratio Superior: 9.41
№78
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 35.33
TTFR rankings: 332
Ratio Superior: 9.4
№79
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.8
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 9.33
№80
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.28
TTFR rankings: 439
Ratio Superior: 9.29
№81
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 60.39
TTFR rankings: 558
Ratio Superior: 9.24
№82
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.05
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 9.16
№83
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.49
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 9.15
№84
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 98.05
TTFR rankings: 889
Ratio Superior: 9.07
№85
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 87.44
TTFR rankings: 791
Ratio Superior: 9.05
№86
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.82
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 9.02
№87
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.56
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 9
№88
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.28
TTFR rankings: 423
Ratio Superior: 8.95
№89
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 49.82
TTFR rankings: 445
Ratio Superior: 8.93
№90
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 47.28
TTFR rankings: 422
Ratio Superior: 8.93
№91
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.49
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 8.86
№92
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.96
TTFR rankings: 273
Ratio Superior: 8.82
№93
Age: 10
Average rating: 14.21
TTFR rankings: 125
Ratio Superior: 8.8
№94
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 83.19
TTFR rankings: 726
Ratio Superior: 8.73
№95
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 11.71
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 8.71
№96
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 116.5
TTFR rankings: 1011
Ratio Superior: 8.68
№97
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 58.75
TTFR rankings: 509
Ratio Superior: 8.66
№98
Age: 13
Average rating: 42.78
TTFR rankings: 370
Ratio Superior: 8.65
№99
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 65.26
TTFR rankings: 560
Ratio Superior: 8.58
№100
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 43.95
TTFR rankings: 377
Ratio Superior: 8.58
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
