The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№1
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 6.84
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 45.18
№2
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.61
TTFR rankings: 725
Ratio Superior: 32.07
№3
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.6
TTFR rankings: 1239
Ratio Superior: 29.78
№4
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.59
TTFR rankings: 1021
Ratio Superior: 28.69
№5
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.67
TTFR rankings: 379
Ratio Superior: 27.72
№6
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.03
TTFR rankings: 573
Ratio Superior: 27.25
№7
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 48.94
TTFR rankings: 1262
Ratio Superior: 25.79
№8
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.25
TTFR rankings: 916
Ratio Superior: 24.59
№9
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.51
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 21.5
№10
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.6
TTFR rankings: 629
Ratio Superior: 21.25
№11
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.51
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 20.88
№12
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.51
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 20.33
№13
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.78
TTFR rankings: 801
Ratio Superior: 20.14
№14
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.87
TTFR rankings: 620
Ratio Superior: 20.08
№15
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.55
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 19.9
№16
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.5
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 19.89
№17
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.14
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 18.1
№18
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.88
TTFR rankings: 1358
Ratio Superior: 17.9
№19
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.01
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 17.86
№20
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.21
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 17.73
№21
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.01
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 17.68
№22
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.37
TTFR rankings: 587
Ratio Superior: 17.59
№23
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 93.21
TTFR rankings: 1634
Ratio Superior: 17.53
№24
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 17.22
№25
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.95
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 17.14
№26
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.5
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 16.8
№27
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 16.47
№28
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.02
TTFR rankings: 907
Ratio Superior: 16.19
№29
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.58
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 16.15
№30
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.29
TTFR rankings: 818
Ratio Superior: 15.95
№31
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 112.91
TTFR rankings: 1771
Ratio Superior: 15.69
№32
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.55
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 15.39
№33
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.58
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 15.11
№34
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.58
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 14.94
№35
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.6
TTFR rankings: 1524
Ratio Superior: 14.71
№36
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 61.14
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 14.69
№37
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.37
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 14.68
№38
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.51
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 14.64
№39
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.12
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 14.61
№40
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 85.98
TTFR rankings: 1254
Ratio Superior: 14.58
№41
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 14.57
№42
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 63.87
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 14.06
№43
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 9.87
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 13.88
№44
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.45
TTFR rankings: 1073
Ratio Superior: 13.68
№45
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.23
TTFR rankings: 468
Ratio Superior: 13.67
№46
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.02
TTFR rankings: 986
Ratio Superior: 13.5
№47
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 88.64
TTFR rankings: 1187
Ratio Superior: 13.39
№48
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 11.84
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 13.34
№49
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.67
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 13.31
№50
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.03
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 13.17
№51
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.46
TTFR rankings: 499
Ratio Superior: 12.97
№52
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.11
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 12.76
№53
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 12.59
№54
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 12.59
№55
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.36
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 12.56
№56
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.84
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 12.5
№57
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 12.49
№58
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 48.94
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 12.46
№59
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.6
TTFR rankings: 555
Ratio Superior: 12.44
№60
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.67
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 12.22
№61
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.37
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 12.2
№62
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.5
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 12.17
№63
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.18
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 12.04
№64
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.62
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 11.9
№65
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.29
TTFR rankings: 606
Ratio Superior: 11.82
№66
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.6
TTFR rankings: 484
Ratio Superior: 11.63
№67
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.11
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 11.61
№68
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.95
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 11.6
№69
Age: 10
Average rating: 10.63
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 11.57
№70
Age: 14
Average rating: 67.92
TTFR rankings: 773
Ratio Superior: 11.38
№71
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.69
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 11.34
№72
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 7.89
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 11.15
№73
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.18
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 11.13
№74
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.02
TTFR rankings: 808
Ratio Superior: 11.07
№75
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.51
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 11.03
№76
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.14
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 11.02
№77
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 10.98
№78
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 7.89
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 10.9
№79
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 5.61
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 10.87
№80
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.7
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 10.72
№81
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.45
TTFR rankings: 840
Ratio Superior: 10.71
№82
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 85.98
TTFR rankings: 917
Ratio Superior: 10.67
№83
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.5
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 10.57
№84
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.6
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 10.53
№85
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.22
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 10.51
№86
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.52
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 10.46
№87
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 44.6
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 10.4
№88
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.29
TTFR rankings: 533
Ratio Superior: 10.39
№89
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.5
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 10.29
№90
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 43.29
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 10.26
№91
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.59
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 10.26
№92
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.06
TTFR rankings: 103
Ratio Superior: 10.24
№93
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.14
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 10.24
№94
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.36
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 10.23
№95
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.62
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 10.16
№96
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 61.14
TTFR rankings: 619
Ratio Superior: 10.12
№97
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 160.51
TTFR rankings: 1617
Ratio Superior: 10.07
№98
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.72
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 10.06
№99
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.18
TTFR rankings: 461
Ratio Superior: 9.98
№100
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.29
TTFR rankings: 512
Ratio Superior: 9.98
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
