The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
1
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.72
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 40.03
2
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.71
TTFR rankings: 725
Ratio Superior: 31.92
3
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.8
TTFR rankings: 1239
Ratio Superior: 28.95
4
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.36
TTFR rankings: 1021
Ratio Superior: 28.87
5
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.99
TTFR rankings: 573
Ratio Superior: 26.06
6
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.8
TTFR rankings: 379
Ratio Superior: 25.61
7
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.89
TTFR rankings: 1262
Ratio Superior: 24.8
8
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.66
TTFR rankings: 916
Ratio Superior: 24.32
9
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.8
TTFR rankings: 312
Ratio Superior: 21.08
10
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.7
TTFR rankings: 629
Ratio Superior: 20.49
11
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.38
TTFR rankings: 801
Ratio Superior: 20.34
12
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.7
TTFR rankings: 620
Ratio Superior: 20.2
13
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.8
TTFR rankings: 295
Ratio Superior: 19.93
14
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 19.74
15
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 348
Ratio Superior: 19.53
16
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.85
TTFR rankings: 190
Ratio Superior: 19.29
17
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.78
TTFR rankings: 587
Ratio Superior: 17.91
18
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.25
TTFR rankings: 286
Ratio Superior: 17.6
19
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.71
TTFR rankings: 274
Ratio Superior: 17.44
20
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.25
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 17.42
21
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.18
TTFR rankings: 1358
Ratio Superior: 17.37
22
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 94.11
TTFR rankings: 1634
Ratio Superior: 17.36
23
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.19
TTFR rankings: 331
Ratio Superior: 17.25
24
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.32
TTFR rankings: 447
Ratio Superior: 16.98
25
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 294
Ratio Superior: 16.5
26
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.89
TTFR rankings: 818
Ratio Superior: 16.07
27
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 57.03
TTFR rankings: 907
Ratio Superior: 15.9
28
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 275
Ratio Superior: 15.43
29
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 116.02
TTFR rankings: 1771
Ratio Superior: 15.26
30
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.72
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 15.18
31
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.39
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 15.09
32
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.78
TTFR rankings: 490
Ratio Superior: 14.95
33
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.19
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 14.59
34
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.94
TTFR rankings: 173
Ratio Superior: 14.49
35
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.49
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 14.37
36
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.25
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 14.34
37
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 106.39
TTFR rankings: 1524
Ratio Superior: 14.32
38
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 88.39
TTFR rankings: 1254
Ratio Superior: 14.19
39
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.39
TTFR rankings: 175
Ratio Superior: 14.12
40
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.25
TTFR rankings: 227
Ratio Superior: 13.97
41
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.03
TTFR rankings: 468
Ratio Superior: 13.75
42
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 72.54
TTFR rankings: 986
Ratio Superior: 13.59
43
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 66.15
TTFR rankings: 898
Ratio Superior: 13.58
44
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.72
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 13.47
45
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 79.86
TTFR rankings: 1073
Ratio Superior: 13.44
46
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.73
TTFR rankings: 182
Ratio Superior: 13.26
47
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 91.71
TTFR rankings: 1187
Ratio Superior: 12.94
48
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.6
TTFR rankings: 137
Ratio Superior: 12.92
49
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.56
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 12.83
50
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.39
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 12.75
51
Age: 12.7
Average rating: 39.38
TTFR rankings: 499
Ratio Superior: 12.67
52
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.19
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 12.61
53
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.99
TTFR rankings: 277
Ratio Superior: 12.6
54
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.19
TTFR rankings: 240
Ratio Superior: 12.51
55
Age: 13
Average rating: 44.89
TTFR rankings: 555
Ratio Superior: 12.36
56
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.73
TTFR rankings: 167
Ratio Superior: 12.16
57
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.78
TTFR rankings: 398
Ratio Superior: 12.14
58
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 242
Ratio Superior: 12.05
59
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.19
TTFR rankings: 231
Ratio Superior: 12.04
60
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 34.03
TTFR rankings: 407
Ratio Superior: 11.96
61
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.78
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 11.96
62
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 213
Ratio Superior: 11.95
63
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.89
TTFR rankings: 606
Ratio Superior: 11.91
64
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.72
TTFR rankings: 484
Ratio Superior: 11.89
65
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 47.56
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 11.69
66
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.87
TTFR rankings: 281
Ratio Superior: 11.3
67
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.99
TTFR rankings: 246
Ratio Superior: 11.19
68
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.85
TTFR rankings: 310
Ratio Superior: 11.13
69
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.32
TTFR rankings: 781
Ratio Superior: 11.11
70
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.32
TTFR rankings: 773
Ratio Superior: 10.99
71
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.26
TTFR rankings: 123
Ratio Superior: 10.92
72
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.8
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 10.81
73
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.94
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 10.8
74
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 85.09
TTFR rankings: 917
Ratio Superior: 10.78
75
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.72
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 10.76
76
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.42
TTFR rankings: 808
Ratio Superior: 10.71
77
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.32
TTFR rankings: 280
Ratio Superior: 10.64
78
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.9
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 10.59
79
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.95
TTFR rankings: 464
Ratio Superior: 10.56
80
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 79.86
TTFR rankings: 840
Ratio Superior: 10.52
81
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 211
Ratio Superior: 10.5
82
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.39
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 10.49
83
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.28
TTFR rankings: 556
Ratio Superior: 10.44
84
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.8
TTFR rankings: 444
Ratio Superior: 10.37
85
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 35.36
TTFR rankings: 365
Ratio Superior: 10.32
86
Age: 9.3
Average rating: 8.39
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 10.25
87
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.04
TTFR rankings: 533
Ratio Superior: 10.24
88
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 180
Ratio Superior: 10.1
89
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 155
Ratio Superior: 10.1
90
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.89
TTFR rankings: 512
Ratio Superior: 10.06
91
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.09
TTFR rankings: 202
Ratio Superior: 10.05
92
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.87
TTFR rankings: 250
Ratio Superior: 10.05
93
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.01
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 9.99
94
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 162.08
TTFR rankings: 1617
Ratio Superior: 9.98
95
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 6.92
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 9.97
96
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 62.49
TTFR rankings: 619
Ratio Superior: 9.91
97
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.19
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 9.85
98
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.71
TTFR rankings: 538
Ratio Superior: 9.83
99
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.7
TTFR rankings: 300
Ratio Superior: 9.77
100
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.7
TTFR rankings: 299
Ratio Superior: 9.74

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников