The most promising young table tennis players. Women



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
101
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 12.82
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 9.98
102
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.4
TTFR rankings: 538
Ratio Superior: 9.89
103
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 189
Ratio Superior: 9.78
104
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 9.73
105
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.34
TTFR rankings: 110
Ratio Superior: 9.7
106
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 300
Ratio Superior: 9.69
107
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 299
Ratio Superior: 9.66
108
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.24
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 9.65
109
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 82.34
TTFR rankings: 792
Ratio Superior: 9.62
110
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.81
TTFR rankings: 160
Ratio Superior: 9.52
111
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.28
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 9.44
112
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 9.24
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 9.42
113
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.24
TTFR rankings: 142
Ratio Superior: 9.32
114
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.45
TTFR rankings: 116
Ratio Superior: 9.32
115
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 9.24
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 9.31
116
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.28
TTFR rankings: 263
Ratio Superior: 9.3
117
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.33
TTFR rankings: 234
Ratio Superior: 9.24
118
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 8.83
TTFR rankings: 81
Ratio Superior: 9.17
119
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 66.69
TTFR rankings: 610
Ratio Superior: 9.15
120
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 56.97
TTFR rankings: 520
Ratio Superior: 9.13
121
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 166
Ratio Superior: 9.12
122
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 137.03
TTFR rankings: 1246
Ratio Superior: 9.09
123
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 37.27
TTFR rankings: 338
Ratio Superior: 9.07
124
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.94
TTFR rankings: 217
Ratio Superior: 9.06
125
Age: 7.8
Average rating: 4.2
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 9.05
126
Age: 7.8
Average rating: 4.2
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 9.05
127
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 146.43
TTFR rankings: 1323
Ratio Superior: 9.04
128
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 169.77
TTFR rankings: 1527
Ratio Superior: 8.99
129
Age: 16
Average rating: 126.69
TTFR rankings: 1135
Ratio Superior: 8.96
130
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.14
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 8.92
131
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.64
TTFR rankings: 93
Ratio Superior: 8.74
132
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 59.04
TTFR rankings: 511
Ratio Superior: 8.66
133
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 61.16
TTFR rankings: 528
Ratio Superior: 8.63
134
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 267
Ratio Superior: 8.63
135
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 41.69
TTFR rankings: 357
Ratio Superior: 8.56
136
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 86.09
TTFR rankings: 735
Ratio Superior: 8.54
137
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 59.04
TTFR rankings: 503
Ratio Superior: 8.52
138
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 21.76
TTFR rankings: 184
Ratio Superior: 8.46
139
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 103.63
TTFR rankings: 871
Ratio Superior: 8.4
140
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.72
TTFR rankings: 249
Ratio Superior: 8.38
141
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.64
TTFR rankings: 89
Ratio Superior: 8.36
142
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.57
TTFR rankings: 130
Ratio Superior: 8.35
143
Age: 7.7
Average rating: 3.84
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 8.33
144
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.56
TTFR rankings: 221
Ratio Superior: 8.32
145
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.26
TTFR rankings: 102
Ratio Superior: 8.32
146
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.94
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 8.31
147
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.49
TTFR rankings: 278
Ratio Superior: 8.3
148
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.33
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 8.29
149
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.34
TTFR rankings: 94
Ratio Superior: 8.29
150
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 54.4
TTFR rankings: 450
Ratio Superior: 8.27
151
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.7
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 8.25
152
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 31.9
TTFR rankings: 261
Ratio Superior: 8.18
153
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 19.33
TTFR rankings: 156
Ratio Superior: 8.07
154
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 93.56
TTFR rankings: 752
Ratio Superior: 8.04
155
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.13
TTFR rankings: 169
Ratio Superior: 8
156
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.14
TTFR rankings: 128
Ratio Superior: 7.93
157
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 100.16
TTFR rankings: 794
Ratio Superior: 7.93
158
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 97.37
TTFR rankings: 763
Ratio Superior: 7.84
159
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 107.37
TTFR rankings: 839
Ratio Superior: 7.81
160
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 146.43
TTFR rankings: 1144
Ratio Superior: 7.81
161
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.21
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 7.77
162
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.27
TTFR rankings: 544
Ratio Superior: 7.74
163
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 137.03
TTFR rankings: 1059
Ratio Superior: 7.73
164
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 97.37
TTFR rankings: 752
Ratio Superior: 7.72
165
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 239
Ratio Superior: 7.72
166
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 176.33
TTFR rankings: 1354
Ratio Superior: 7.68
167
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 33.49
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 7.67
168
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 5.13
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 7.6
169
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.27
TTFR rankings: 532
Ratio Superior: 7.57
170
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 70.27
TTFR rankings: 532
Ratio Superior: 7.57
171
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 38.53
TTFR rankings: 291
Ratio Superior: 7.55
172
Age: 15
Average rating: 94.55
TTFR rankings: 714
Ratio Superior: 7.55
173
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 97.37
TTFR rankings: 730
Ratio Superior: 7.5
174
Age: 16.5
Average rating: 154.8
TTFR rankings: 1157
Ratio Superior: 7.47
175
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 136
Ratio Superior: 7.47
176
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 137.03
TTFR rankings: 1022
Ratio Superior: 7.46
177
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 49.05
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 7.42
178
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.37
TTFR rankings: 388
Ratio Superior: 7.41
179
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.94
TTFR rankings: 177
Ratio Superior: 7.39
180
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.21
TTFR rankings: 149
Ratio Superior: 7.37
181
Age: 12
Average rating: 29.72
TTFR rankings: 219
Ratio Superior: 7.37
182
Age: 13
Average rating: 46.16
TTFR rankings: 340
Ratio Superior: 7.37
183
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 86.09
TTFR rankings: 633
Ratio Superior: 7.35
184
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 66.69
TTFR rankings: 488
Ratio Superior: 7.32
185
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 51.27
TTFR rankings: 373
Ratio Superior: 7.28
186
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 30.95
TTFR rankings: 225
Ratio Superior: 7.27
187
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.57
TTFR rankings: 113
Ratio Superior: 7.26
188
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 10.64
TTFR rankings: 77
Ratio Superior: 7.24
189
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.21
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 7.22
190
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 80.43
TTFR rankings: 581
Ratio Superior: 7.22
191
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.58
TTFR rankings: 105
Ratio Superior: 7.2
192
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 112.94
TTFR rankings: 812
Ratio Superior: 7.19
193
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 73.1
TTFR rankings: 525
Ratio Superior: 7.18
194
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 90.49
TTFR rankings: 649
Ratio Superior: 7.17
195
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 56.02
TTFR rankings: 401
Ratio Superior: 7.16
196
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.56
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 7.08
197
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.45
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 7.07
198
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 107.37
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 7.06
199
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 61.16
TTFR rankings: 431
Ratio Superior: 7.05
200
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 28.28
TTFR rankings: 199
Ratio Superior: 7.04

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников