The most promising young table tennis players. Women
№201
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.59
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 6.82
№202
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 102.96
TTFR rankings: 701
Ratio Superior: 6.81
№203
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 12.97
TTFR rankings: 88
Ratio Superior: 6.78
№204
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 111.82
TTFR rankings: 758
Ratio Superior: 6.78
№205
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.85
TTFR rankings: 188
Ratio Superior: 6.75
№206
Age: 7.8
Average rating: 5.65
TTFR rankings: 38
Ratio Superior: 6.73
№207
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.85
TTFR rankings: 187
Ratio Superior: 6.71
№208
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.87
TTFR rankings: 165
Ratio Superior: 6.63
№209
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 11.94
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 6.62
№210
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 277.29
TTFR rankings: 1834
Ratio Superior: 6.61
№211
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.8
TTFR rankings: 283
Ratio Superior: 6.61
№212
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 54.74
TTFR rankings: 361
Ratio Superior: 6.59
№213
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 120
Ratio Superior: 6.59
№214
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.95
TTFR rankings: 289
Ratio Superior: 6.58
№215
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 100.65
TTFR rankings: 661
Ratio Superior: 6.57
№216
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.78
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 6.56
№217
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.01
TTFR rankings: 72
Ratio Superior: 6.54
№218
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 100
Ratio Superior: 6.51
№219
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.72
TTFR rankings: 265
Ratio Superior: 6.51
№220
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 8
TTFR rankings: 52
Ratio Superior: 6.5
№221
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 118
Ratio Superior: 6.48
№222
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 9.12
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 6.47
№223
Age: 15
Average rating: 95.6
TTFR rankings: 618
Ratio Superior: 6.46
№224
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.31
TTFR rankings: 506
Ratio Superior: 6.46
№225
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 15.35
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 6.45
№226
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 16.25
TTFR rankings: 104
Ratio Superior: 6.4
№227
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.71
TTFR rankings: 145
Ratio Superior: 6.38
№228
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.27
TTFR rankings: 435
Ratio Superior: 6.37
№229
Age: 7.7
Average rating: 5.04
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 6.35
№230
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 22.71
TTFR rankings: 144
Ratio Superior: 6.34
№231
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.73
TTFR rankings: 87
Ratio Superior: 6.34
№232
Age: 11
Average rating: 16.9
TTFR rankings: 107
Ratio Superior: 6.33
№233
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 75.55
TTFR rankings: 478
Ratio Superior: 6.33
№234
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 52.06
TTFR rankings: 329
Ratio Superior: 6.32
№235
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 11.59
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 6.3
№236
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.27
TTFR rankings: 430
Ratio Superior: 6.3
№237
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 111.82
TTFR rankings: 704
Ratio Superior: 6.3
№238
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 119.32
TTFR rankings: 751
Ratio Superior: 6.29
№239
Age: 8.5
Average rating: 6.21
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 6.28
№240
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 43.95
TTFR rankings: 276
Ratio Superior: 6.28
№241
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 102.96
TTFR rankings: 645
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№242
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 8.78
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№243
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 111.82
TTFR rankings: 700
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№244
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.26
TTFR rankings: 83
Ratio Superior: 6.26
№245
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.25
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 6.24
№246
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 37.66
TTFR rankings: 235
Ratio Superior: 6.24
№247
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 111
Ratio Superior: 6.23
№248
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.31
TTFR rankings: 485
Ratio Superior: 6.19
№249
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 315
Ratio Superior: 6.19
№250
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 13.26
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 6.18
№251
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 6.48
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 6.17
№252
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 172.16
TTFR rankings: 1059
Ratio Superior: 6.15
№253
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.8
TTFR rankings: 91
Ratio Superior: 6.15
№254
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.78
TTFR rankings: 201
Ratio Superior: 6.13
№255
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 40.72
TTFR rankings: 248
Ratio Superior: 6.09
№256
Age: 9
Average rating: 7.72
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 6.09
№257
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.01
TTFR rankings: 67
Ratio Superior: 6.09
№258
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 124.75
TTFR rankings: 759
Ratio Superior: 6.08
№259
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 59.85
TTFR rankings: 364
Ratio Superior: 6.08
№260
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 58.46
TTFR rankings: 355
Ratio Superior: 6.07
№261
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.25
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 6.05
№262
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 10.25
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 6.05
№263
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.58
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 6.04
№264
Age: 10
Average rating: 11.26
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 6.04
№265
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 72.68
TTFR rankings: 438
Ratio Superior: 6.03
№266
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 78.31
TTFR rankings: 471
Ratio Superior: 6.01
№267
Age: 19.1
Average rating: 295.74
TTFR rankings: 1777
Ratio Superior: 6.01
№268
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.8
TTFR rankings: 257
Ratio Superior: 6
№269
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 162.22
TTFR rankings: 974
Ratio Superior: 6
№270
Age: 16
Average rating: 129.17
TTFR rankings: 772
Ratio Superior: 5.98
№271
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 91.87
TTFR rankings: 549
Ratio Superior: 5.98
№272
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.32
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 5.97
№273
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 18.2
TTFR rankings: 108
Ratio Superior: 5.93
№274
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 23.55
TTFR rankings: 139
Ratio Superior: 5.9
№275
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 50.92
TTFR rankings: 300
Ratio Superior: 5.89
№276
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 9.85
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 5.89
№277
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 212.14
TTFR rankings: 1245
Ratio Superior: 5.87
№278
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 42.8
TTFR rankings: 251
Ratio Superior: 5.86
№279
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.85
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 5.85
№280
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 58.46
TTFR rankings: 342
Ratio Superior: 5.85
№281
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 152.16
TTFR rankings: 890
Ratio Superior: 5.85
№282
Age: 17.7
Average rating: 212.14
TTFR rankings: 1239
Ratio Superior: 5.84
№283
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 102.96
TTFR rankings: 600
Ratio Superior: 5.83
№284
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 9.12
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 5.81
№285
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.8
TTFR rankings: 86
Ratio Superior: 5.81
№286
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 88.55
TTFR rankings: 514
Ratio Superior: 5.8
№287
Age: 19.4
Average rating: 346.44
TTFR rankings: 2002
Ratio Superior: 5.78
№288
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 13.73
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 5.75
№289
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 100.65
TTFR rankings: 578
Ratio Superior: 5.74
№290
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 12.39
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 5.73
№291
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 11.01
TTFR rankings: 63
Ratio Superior: 5.72
№292
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.3
TTFR rankings: 304
Ratio Superior: 5.7
№293
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 53.3
TTFR rankings: 303
Ratio Superior: 5.68
№294
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.8
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 5.68
№295
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 14.8
TTFR rankings: 84
Ratio Superior: 5.68
№296
Age: 11.9
Average rating: 27.85
TTFR rankings: 158
Ratio Superior: 5.67
№297
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 9.52
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 5.67
№298
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 24.87
TTFR rankings: 141
Ratio Superior: 5.67
№299
Age: 14
Average rating: 68.27
TTFR rankings: 387
Ratio Superior: 5.67
№300
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 36.17
TTFR rankings: 205
Ratio Superior: 5.67
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
