A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

Player
Country
Category
Time
- 2024


Pair
Wins
Defeats
Ratio
Number of matches
Rmax
R1,2,3
Rmin
R1,2,3
Synergistic effect
1
Wins: 1
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 1
Number of matches: 2
Rmax: 7922
R1,2,3: 7922
Rmin: 5286
R1,2,3: 5286
Synergistic effect: 2.44
2
Wins: 2
Defeats: 3
Ratio: 0.67
Number of matches: 5
Rmax: 2915
R1,2,3: 1613
Rmin: 1170
R1,2,3: 4332
Synergistic effect: 0.43
3
Wins: 2
Defeats: 4
Ratio: 0.5
Number of matches: 6
Rmax: 3696
R1,2,3: 3288
Rmin: 4208
R1,2,3: 4310
Synergistic effect: 1.02
4
Wins: 2
Defeats: 2
Ratio: 1
Number of matches: 4
Rmax: 3414
R1,2,3: 3122
Rmin: 3399
R1,2,3: 3562
Synergistic effect: 1.15
5
Wins: 9
Defeats: 12
Ratio: 0.75
Number of matches: 21
Rmax: 4325
R1,2,3: 4083
Rmin: 3079
R1,2,3: 3365
Synergistic effect: 1.01
6
Wins: 3
Defeats: 4
Ratio: 0.75
Number of matches: 7
Rmax: 1628
R1,2,3: 986
Rmin: 3103
R1,2,3: 3274
Synergistic effect: 0.95
7
Wins: 2
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 2
Number of matches: 3
Rmax: 670
R1,2,3: 335
Rmin: 2998
R1,2,3: 2998
Synergistic effect: -
8
Wins: 7
Defeats: 6
Ratio: 1.17
Number of matches: 13
Rmax: 6302
R1,2,3: 5284
Rmin: 2465
R1,2,3: 2969
Synergistic effect: 0.7
9
Wins: 12
Defeats: 10
Ratio: 1.2
Number of matches: 22
Rmax: 8606
R1,2,3: 6079
Rmin: 760
R1,2,3: 2665
Synergistic effect: 0.83
10
Wins: 2
Defeats: 3
Ratio: 0.67
Number of matches: 5
Rmax: 252
R1,2,3: 170
Rmin: 63
R1,2,3: 1624
Synergistic effect: 1.17
11
Wins: 3
Defeats: 8
Ratio: 0.38
Number of matches: 11
Rmax: 6200
R1,2,3: 3198
Rmin: 118
R1,2,3: 767
Synergistic effect: 0.69
12
Wins: 0
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 0
Number of matches: 1
Rmax: 0
R1,2,3:
Rmin: 240
R1,2,3: 240
Synergistic effect: -
13
Wins: 2
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 2
Number of matches: 3
Rmax: 483
R1,2,3: 443
Rmin: 153
R1,2,3: 153
Synergistic effect: 0.12
14
Wins: 0
Defeats: 1
Ratio: 0
Number of matches: 1
Rmax: 0
R1,2,3:
Rmin: 3
R1,2,3: 3
Synergistic effect: 0.06