The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
2201
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.21
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2202
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.76
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2203
Age: 10.1
Average rating: 16.66
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2204
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 291.56
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2205
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.67
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2206
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 114.23
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2207
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 204.98
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2208
Age: 15.4
Average rating: 85.11
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2209
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 159.51
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2210
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 96.56
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2211
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 81.19
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2212
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 35
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2213
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 204.98
TTFR rankings: 146
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2214
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.34
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2215
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 14.06
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2216
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 98.49
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2217
Age: 20
Average rating: 348.68
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2218
Age: 8.7
Average rating: 14.12
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2219
Age: 20.1
Average rating: 349.09
TTFR rankings: 247
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2220
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 57.96
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2221
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.28
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2222
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.48
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2223
Age: 14
Average rating: 56.65
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2224
Age: 11
Average rating: 19.84
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2225
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.03
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2226
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 64.18
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2227
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 64.18
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2228
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.84
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2229
Age: 16.2
Average rating: 114.23
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2230
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 17.18
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2231
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.11
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2232
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 15.79
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2233
Age: 16.7
Average rating: 129.29
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2234
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 18.71
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2235
Age: 10.7
Average rating: 18.71
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2236
Age: 16.9
Average rating: 141.25
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2237
Age: 15
Average rating: 76.41
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2238
Age: 17.9
Average rating: 192.59
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2239
Age: 14
Average rating: 56.65
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2240
Age: 8
Average rating: 14.56
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2241
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.44
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2242
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.34
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2243
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 49.54
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2244
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 49.54
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2245
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 49.54
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2246
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 20.44
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2247
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.13
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2248
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.91
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2249
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 19
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2250
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.48
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2251
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.48
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2252
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 16.14
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2253
Age: 9.7
Average rating: 16.14
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2254
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2255
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 17.69
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2256
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 19.17
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2257
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 345.07
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2258
Age: 9
Average rating: 14.81
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2259
Age: 9
Average rating: 14.81
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2260
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2261
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 17.82
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2262
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 16.35
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2263
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.18
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2264
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 61.22
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2265
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 68.78
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2266
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 68.78
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2267
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 79.25
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2268
Age: 15
Average rating: 76.41
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2269
Age: 15
Average rating: 76.41
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2270
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.44
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2271
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.6
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2272
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.27
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2273
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.34
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2274
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 80.34
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2275
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 42.48
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2276
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.84
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2277
Age: 10.6
Average rating: 18.29
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2278
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2279
Age: 15
Average rating: 76.41
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2280
Age: 15
Average rating: 76.41
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2281
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.65
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2282
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 61.22
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2283
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.45
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2284
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 21.45
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2285
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 93.49
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2286
Age: 10.2
Average rating: 16.88
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2287
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 175.39
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2288
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 104.63
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2289
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.44
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2290
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.73
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2291
Age: 16.4
Average rating: 122.11
TTFR rankings: 79
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2292
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 49.54
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2293
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 238.71
TTFR rankings: 154
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2294
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 54.41
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2295
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.12
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2296
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.12
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2297
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.27
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2298
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 48.27
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2299
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 93.49
TTFR rankings: 60
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2300
Age: 13
Average rating: 40.53
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.64

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников