The most promising young table tennis players. Men



Athletes

Age
Full name
Average rating
TTFR rankings
Ratio Superior
2101
Age: 9.5
Average rating: 13.86
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2102
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.23
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2103
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.65
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2104
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.18
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2105
Age: 13.1
Average rating: 41.79
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2106
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.79
TTFR rankings: 55
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2107
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.35
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2108
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.52
TTFR rankings: 82
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2109
Age: 8.8
Average rating: 12.57
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2110
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.75
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.72
2111
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.81
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2112
Age: 18.1
Average rating: 206.43
TTFR rankings: 147
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2113
Age: 8.3
Average rating: 11.28
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2114
Age: 8
Average rating: 11.29
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2115
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.51
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2116
Age: 9
Average rating: 12.73
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2117
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 86.34
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2118
Age: 8.9
Average rating: 12.74
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.71
2119
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.56
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2120
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.43
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2121
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 12.8
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2122
Age: 9.1
Average rating: 12.8
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2123
Age: 11.4
Average rating: 21.35
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2124
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.27
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2125
Age: 18.7
Average rating: 255.68
TTFR rankings: 179
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2126
Age: 16.1
Average rating: 114.52
TTFR rankings: 80
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2127
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.74
TTFR rankings: 27
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2128
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.65
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2129
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.65
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2130
Age: 19.3
Average rating: 301.9
TTFR rankings: 210
Ratio Superior: 0.7
2131
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 192.03
TTFR rankings: 133
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2132
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 130.04
TTFR rankings: 90
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2133
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.95
TTFR rankings: 58
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2134
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.25
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2135
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.25
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2136
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.79
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2137
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.51
TTFR rankings: 39
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2138
Age: 15.8
Average rating: 101.43
TTFR rankings: 70
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2139
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2140
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2141
Age: 7.8
Average rating: 11.62
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2142
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.35
TTFR rankings: 98
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2143
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.3
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2144
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.3
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.69
2145
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.23
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2146
Age: 11
Average rating: 19
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2147
Age: 11
Average rating: 19
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2148
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.44
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2149
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.44
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2150
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.3
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.68
2151
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 345.34
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2152
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.83
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2153
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 17.85
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2154
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.74
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2155
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.27
TTFR rankings: 41
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2156
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.34
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2157
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.34
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2158
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 171.02
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2159
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.52
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2160
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.52
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.67
2161
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.79
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2162
Age: 13.7
Average rating: 51.27
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2163
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.2
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2164
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.2
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2165
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.56
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2166
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.15
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2167
Age: 13.5
Average rating: 48.43
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2168
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.28
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 0.66
2169
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.27
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2170
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.79
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2171
Age: 14.9
Average rating: 76.79
TTFR rankings: 50
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2172
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.94
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2173
Age: 11.7
Average rating: 24.58
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2174
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.3
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2175
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.71
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2176
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.8
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2177
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.75
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2178
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.75
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2179
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.53
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2180
Age: 13.2
Average rating: 43.34
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2181
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.23
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2182
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.23
TTFR rankings: 35
Ratio Superior: 0.65
2183
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.18
TTFR rankings: 53
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2184
Age: 13.4
Average rating: 46.78
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2185
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.63
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2186
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 178.79
TTFR rankings: 114
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2187
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 119.2
TTFR rankings: 76
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2188
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.51
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2189
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 107
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2190
Age: 9.6
Average rating: 14.17
TTFR rankings: 9
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2191
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.43
TTFR rankings: 46
Ratio Superior: 0.64
2192
Age: 15.6
Average rating: 96.35
TTFR rankings: 61
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2193
Age: 15.5
Average rating: 93.59
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2194
Age: 15.7
Average rating: 98.49
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2195
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.2
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2196
Age: 12.6
Average rating: 34.98
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2197
Age: 9
Average rating: 12.73
TTFR rankings: 8
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2198
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 342.47
TTFR rankings: 215
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2199
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.94
TTFR rankings: 25
Ratio Superior: 0.63
2200
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.67
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.62

_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников