The most promising young table tennis players. Men
№1901
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.35
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1902
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.35
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1903
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.3
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1904
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 16.17
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1905
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.2
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1906
Age: 12.2
Average rating: 30.2
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.93
№1907
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.18
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1908
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.18
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1909
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.18
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1910
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.54
TTFR rankings: 64
Ratio Superior: 0.92
№1911
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 45.93
TTFR rankings: 42
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1912
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.49
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1913
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.25
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1914
Age: 14.2
Average rating: 61.35
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1915
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.45
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1916
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 72.45
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1917
Age: 14.1
Average rating: 59.28
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1918
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 62.63
TTFR rankings: 57
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1919
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.07
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1920
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 142.28
TTFR rankings: 129
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1921
Age: 17.2
Average rating: 154.58
TTFR rankings: 140
Ratio Superior: 0.91
№1922
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.63
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1923
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.63
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1924
Age: 18.8
Average rating: 258.37
TTFR rankings: 233
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1925
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.94
TTFR rankings: 36
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1926
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.49
TTFR rankings: 68
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1927
Age: 16.8
Average rating: 140.21
TTFR rankings: 126
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1928
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 32.3
TTFR rankings: 29
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1929
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.06
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1930
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.06
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1931
Age: 19.5
Average rating: 327
TTFR rankings: 293
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1932
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.44
TTFR rankings: 21
Ratio Superior: 0.9
№1933
Age: 11
Average rating: 19
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1934
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.75
TTFR rankings: 40
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1935
Age: 13.6
Average rating: 49.25
TTFR rankings: 44
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1936
Age: 18
Average rating: 202.62
TTFR rankings: 181
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1937
Age: 18.6
Average rating: 249.7
TTFR rankings: 223
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1938
Age: 10.5
Average rating: 16.81
TTFR rankings: 15
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1939
Age: 14.4
Average rating: 66.15
TTFR rankings: 59
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1940
Age: 14.6
Average rating: 69.54
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1941
Age: 9.8
Average rating: 14.6
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1942
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.23
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1943
Age: 12.1
Average rating: 29.23
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1944
Age: 18.2
Average rating: 208.68
TTFR rankings: 185
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1945
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.31
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.89
№1946
Age: 10.3
Average rating: 15.82
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1947
Age: 20
Average rating: 350.24
TTFR rankings: 309
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1948
Age: 10.8
Average rating: 18.15
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1949
Age: 12.5
Average rating: 34.09
TTFR rankings: 30
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1950
Age: 9.4
Average rating: 13.65
TTFR rankings: 12
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1951
Age: 19.7
Average rating: 342.44
TTFR rankings: 301
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1952
Age: 17.6
Average rating: 178.74
TTFR rankings: 157
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1953
Age: 11.3
Average rating: 20.52
TTFR rankings: 18
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1954
Age: 9.9
Average rating: 14.83
TTFR rankings: 13
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1955
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.21
TTFR rankings: 51
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1956
Age: 14.7
Average rating: 70.79
TTFR rankings: 62
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1957
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 26.28
TTFR rankings: 23
Ratio Superior: 0.88
№1958
Age: 14.8
Average rating: 75.49
TTFR rankings: 66
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1959
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.52
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1960
Age: 11.1
Average rating: 19.52
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1961
Age: 15.3
Average rating: 83.86
TTFR rankings: 73
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1962
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 121.96
TTFR rankings: 106
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1963
Age: 19.2
Average rating: 296.95
TTFR rankings: 258
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1964
Age: 17.1
Average rating: 152.02
TTFR rankings: 132
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1965
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 54.23
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1966
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.63
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1967
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 11.56
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1968
Age: 8.6
Average rating: 11.56
TTFR rankings: 10
Ratio Superior: 0.87
№1969
Age: 10.9
Average rating: 18.53
TTFR rankings: 16
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1970
Age: 15.9
Average rating: 106.92
TTFR rankings: 92
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1971
Age: 13.8
Average rating: 52.3
TTFR rankings: 45
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1972
Age: 15.2
Average rating: 82.69
TTFR rankings: 71
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1973
Age: 11.8
Average rating: 25.67
TTFR rankings: 22
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1974
Age: 10.4
Average rating: 16.36
TTFR rankings: 14
Ratio Superior: 0.86
№1975
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.44
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1976
Age: 11.6
Average rating: 23.44
TTFR rankings: 20
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1977
Age: 12
Average rating: 28.18
TTFR rankings: 24
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1978
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.94
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1979
Age: 12.9
Average rating: 39.94
TTFR rankings: 34
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1980
Age: 19.8
Average rating: 350.3
TTFR rankings: 298
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1981
Age: 17.8
Average rating: 191.98
TTFR rankings: 163
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1982
Age: 11.2
Average rating: 20.06
TTFR rankings: 17
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1983
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.07
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1984
Age: 12.4
Average rating: 33.07
TTFR rankings: 28
Ratio Superior: 0.85
№1985
Age: 11.5
Average rating: 22.55
TTFR rankings: 19
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1986
Age: 14
Average rating: 58.21
TTFR rankings: 49
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1987
Age: 15.1
Average rating: 82.09
TTFR rankings: 69
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1988
Age: 17.3
Average rating: 160.79
TTFR rankings: 135
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1989
Age: 9.2
Average rating: 13.11
TTFR rankings: 11
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1990
Age: 16.6
Average rating: 129.97
TTFR rankings: 109
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1991
Age: 14.3
Average rating: 64.63
TTFR rankings: 54
Ratio Superior: 0.84
№1992
Age: 13.9
Average rating: 56.51
TTFR rankings: 47
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1993
Age: 16.3
Average rating: 119.13
TTFR rankings: 99
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1994
Age: 12.3
Average rating: 31.3
TTFR rankings: 26
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1995
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.69
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1996
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.69
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1997
Age: 14.5
Average rating: 67.69
TTFR rankings: 56
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1998
Age: 13.3
Average rating: 44.75
TTFR rankings: 37
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№1999
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 38.74
TTFR rankings: 32
Ratio Superior: 0.83
№2000
Age: 12.8
Average rating: 37.63
TTFR rankings: 31
Ratio Superior: 0.82
_____________
* Ratio Superior - отношение текущего рейтинга ФНТР
спортсмена к среднему его значению у ровесников
Русский
English
