A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Gommers Rajko
Tromer Laurens

Wins: 7

Defeats: 8

Ratio: 0.88

Number of matches: 15

R_max: 3766

R_1,2,3: 3098

R_min: 2691

R_1,2,3: 2710

Synergistic effect: 1.11

№2

Pair: Gommers Rajko
Khatchanov Martin

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 3167

R_1,2,3: 3167

R_min: 4122

R_1,2,3: 4122

Synergistic effect: 1.2

№3

Pair: Oostwouder Ewout
Gommers Rajko

Wins: 5

Defeats: 10

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 15

R_max: 2971

R_1,2,3: 2323

R_min: 2128

R_1,2,3: 2441

Synergistic effect: 0.75

№4

Pair: Hageraats Koen
Gommers Rajko

Wins: 11

Defeats: 6

Ratio: 1.83

Number of matches: 17

R_max: 2841

R_1,2,3: 2392

R_min: 1538

R_1,2,3: 2222

Synergistic effect: 1.02

№5

Pair: Mccreery Paul
Gommers Rajko

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 1985

R_1,2,3: 1985

R_min: 3648

R_1,2,3: 3648

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Gommers Rajko
Mladin Paul

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 248

R_1,2,3: 248

R_min: 2979

R_1,2,3: 2979

Synergistic effect: -

№7

Pair: Castro Lidney
Gommers Rajko

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 120

R_1,2,3: 60

R_min: 2412

R_1,2,3: 2829

Synergistic effect: 0.9

№8

Pair: Tauber Michael
Gommers Rajko

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3515

R_1,2,3: 3515

Synergistic effect: -

№9

Pair: Gommers Rajko
Peral Xavier

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2251

R_1,2,3: 2251

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Wisniewski Tomasz
Gommers Rajko

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2202

R_1,2,3: 2202

Synergistic effect: 0.98