A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Wang Eugene
Hazin Jeremy

Wins: 2

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 4

R_max: 6235

R_1,2,3: 4462

R_min: 1707

R_1,2,3: 2224

Synergistic effect: 0.93

№2

Pair: Theriault Pierre-Luc
Wang Eugene

Wins: 3

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 0.75

Number of matches: 7

R_max: 4581

R_1,2,3: 3810

R_min: 3626

R_1,2,3: 4143

Synergistic effect: 1.12

№3

Pair: Wang Eugene
Li Ahmet

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 3594

R_1,2,3: 3594

R_min: 3933

R_1,2,3: 3933

Synergistic effect: 0.94

№4

Pair: Wang Eugene
Medjugorac Marko

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 3290

R_1,2,3: 2718

R_min: 11655

R_1,2,3: 11655

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Rogiers Benjamin
Wang Eugene

Wins: 2

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 2

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 2494

R_1,2,3: 1496

R_min: 5335

R_1,2,3: 5335

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Wang Eugene
Martin Simeon

Wins: 5

Defeats: 4

Ratio: 1.25

Number of matches: 9

R_max: 277

R_1,2,3: 205

R_min: 63

R_1,2,3: 159

Synergistic effect: 0.65

№7

Pair: Wang Eugene
Ly Edward

Wins: 1

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 1

Number of matches: 2

R_max: 135

R_1,2,3: 135

R_min: 241

R_1,2,3: 241

Synergistic effect: 0.6

№8

Pair: Wang Eugene
Ji Max

Wins: 1

Defeats: 2

Ratio: 0.5

Number of matches: 3

R_max: 9

R_1,2,3: 9

R_min: 30

R_1,2,3: 92

Synergistic effect: 0.25

№9

Pair: Zhmudenko Yaroslav
Wang Eugene

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3948

R_1,2,3: 3948

Synergistic effect: -

№10

Pair: Li Ping
Wang Eugene

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 4227

R_1,2,3: 4227

Synergistic effect: 0.99

№11

Pair: Wang Eugene
Wu Jiaji

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 3933

R_1,2,3: 3933

Synergistic effect: 0.97

№12

Pair: Wang Eugene
Chen Hongtao

Wins: 0

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 5

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 118

R_1,2,3: 2493

Synergistic effect: 0.29