A competition analysis of the double disciplines in table tennis

№1

Pair: Gura Paulius
Navickas Ignas

Wins: 1

Defeats: 5

Ratio: 0.2

Number of matches: 6

R_max: 1237

R_1,2,3: 1237

R_min: 0

R_1,2,3: 1409

Synergistic effect: -

№2

Pair: Kuperberg Elad
Navickas Ignas

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 2364

R_1,2,3: 2364

Synergistic effect: -

№3

Pair: Navickas Ignas
Cecchetti Tommaso

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1707

R_1,2,3: 1707

Synergistic effect: -

№4

Pair: Navickas Ignas
Ruohonen Sami

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1574

R_1,2,3: 1574

Synergistic effect: -

№5

Pair: Navickas Ignas
Daix Pol

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1896

R_1,2,3: 1896

Synergistic effect: -

№6

Pair: Zeimys Kestutis
Navickas Ignas

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 47

R_1,2,3: 47

Synergistic effect: 0.02

№7

Pair: Milovanov Andrey
Navickas Ignas

Wins: 0

Defeats: 1

Ratio: 0

Number of matches: 1

R_max: 0

R_1,2,3:

R_min: 1579

R_1,2,3: 1579

Synergistic effect: 0.94